About the poem
“A Poison Tree” is a poem written by English poet William Blake, first posted in his Songs of Experience in 1794. In deceptively simple language with an almost nursery-rhyme quality, the speaker of the poem info different procedures to anger. At first, openly speaking about anger is presented as a manner of transferring beyond it. Secondly, the speaker outlines the danger of retaining anger within. In this poem, the writer uses metaphor to describe the speaker’s anger as growing right into a tree that bears poisonous apples. The speaker’s enemy then eats an apple from the tree and dies. The poem is commonly interpreted as an allegory for the chance of bottling up feelings, and the way of doing so results in a cycle of negativity or even violence.
“A Poison Tree” Summary
The speaker recounts being mad at a friend. The speaker informed their friend approximately this anger, which ultimately went away. By contrast, whilst the speaker turned into indignant with an enemy, the speaker saved quiet. Their anger then increased. The speaker cultivated this anger as though it had been something planted in a garden, metaphorically nourishing it with fears and tears, both day and night. The speaker’s smiles and other mild deceptions used to cover the anger, in fact, best fed the anger in addition.
The anger grew constantly until it has become a tree, which bore a brilliant apple. Speaker’s enemy noticed this apple shining and knew it belonged to the speaker. The enemy snuck into the speaker’s garden throughout the useless of night. The subsequent morning, the speaker is happy to peer this enemy lying dead tree.
“A Poison Tree” Theme
In “A Poison Tree” the speaker presents a powerful argument towards the suppression of anger. By truly laying out the advantages of speaking about anger, and the effects of retaining negative feelings within, the poem implies to the reader that the suppression of anger is morally dangerous, leading to more anger or even violence.
The speaker provides wonderful scenarios to illustrate the danger of suppressing anger. In the first lines of the poem, the speaker describes admitting his or her “wrath” to a friend; as soon because the speaker does so, this “wrath” ends. Honesty and frankness, the speaker makes clean, causes anger to disappear.
By contrast, as defined in lines 2 thru lines 16 of the poem, the poem info the negative results of suppressed anger. In these strains, the speaker does now not open up about being angry. Instead, the speaker actively has a tendency to his or her wrath as if it has been a lawn, watering it with “fears” and “tears,” and “sunning” it with “smiles” and cunning deceit in a manner that shows a form of morbid pleasure.
The speaker’s cautious cultivation of this rage-lawn implies an inability to move on from whatever made the speaker irritated in the first place, in addition to the self-perpetuating nature of negative emotions; anger encourages fear, despair, and deceit—which, in turn, genuinely nourish more anger. The suppression of emotion thus begins a cycle of festering negativity that ultimately takes on a life of its own. Through the increase of the tree and its toxic apple, the repression of anger is shown to motivate a chain reaction that makes the problem a long way worse than it’d had the speaker and the “foe” just talked through their issues.
This toxic growth contrasts with the simple way in which the anger becomes eliminated inside the first scenario—when it became “informed.” Through this contrast, the poem makes clean a moral choice: either communicate and discover solutions. hold quiet and permit ways-reaching, toxic results that come when people maintain their indignant emotions too close to the chest. Implicit within the poem. the concept that the root of human war grows from the lack of ability to find common ground through meaningful communication. The speaker is “glad” to locate the enemy mendacity lifeless under the tree indicates the way wherein, in the 2d scenario, the anger more and more dominates the way the speaker sees other human beings. The speaker becomes a host for the increase of anger, which feeds on others’ pain.
The simplicity of the strains and the use of prolonged metaphor—the growth of the tree displays the boom of the anger—additionally makes the message of the poem relevant properly past the immediate battle between the speaker and the foe. In fact, these figures can be studied as allegorical representations of various components of humanity itself, displaying the way that battle and hatred develop from misplaced anger. The poem’s moral message is further amplified through the clear allusion among the poison tree of the poem to the tree within the garden of Eden. The poem can consequently be examined as an issue towards the psychological suppression of anger on both the personal and societal levels.
“A Poison Tree” ultimately makes a powerful argument in choose of opening up and trusting within the human capacity for empathy and understanding. The alternative, the poem argues, is a way more dangerous.
To read more poem
Ode on a Grecian Urn by John Keats